The following letter and summary comes from the Trustees of Harbor Towers Tower I and II condominiums to the Boston Redevelopment Authority. The letter strongly opposes the Chiofaro Company plan for redevelopment of the Harbor Garage presented at the June 25, 2014, meeting of the Municipal Harbor Planning Advisory Committee.
[button link=”http://northendwaterfront.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/HTlettertoBRArespondingtoChiofaroplan.July_.21.2014.pdf”]Click here to download the 12-page letter (pdf)[/button]
In brief summary, the letter says:
Harbor Towers believes that, while there is a great deal of vital information yet unknown about the Chiofaro plan, it is at 1.3 million square feet manifestly too big for this sensitive waterfront site.
Harbor Towers is in favor of reasonably scaled redevelopment of the Garage site. But the community believes this proposal does not honor the basic policies that underlie the Greenway District Guidelines and Chapter 91 regulations.
The Chiofaro Co.’s current proposal is not materially different, in scale and density, from the company’s plan four years ago that was universally considered to be overwhelming for this waterfront site adjacent to the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway.
The recently proposed project is historically and contemporaneously inappropriate in scale, height and density for a location adjacent to two Boston treasures, the Rose Kennedy Greenway and the Harbor.
The proposed floor area ratio of about 24 cannot be rationally justified. (Please see attached graphic showing FARs.)
Harbor Towers seriously questions whether what was defined in the presentation as “open space” would qualify under Chap. 91.
Since modern urban planning began here in Boston in the early 1960s, it has been customary and an article of faith that we do not build huge skyscrapers and excessive density on our waterfront; the recent, professionally conducted Greenway District Guidelines, supported by broad public participation, reinforced that principle.
Adding a project of the proposed density to this location would alter the scale of Boston’s waterfront forever. And Harbor Towers is gravely concerned that, if a development as large as this proposal is allowed to go forward on the Harbor Garage site, it will set a precedent for other sites also right on the Harbor’s edge.
The Chiofaro Co. has essentially said: If you want any development of the Garage at all, you must accept this proposal. Harbor Towers believes that the City must not let this become an all-or-nothing proposition. If it is, the Chiofaro proposal should be rejected.
An enormous amount of additional detail is required, and must be publicly presented, before any proposal can be allowed to go through the City’s Article 80 approval process. There are many unanswered questions, including: What are the shapes and designs of the two buildings? How are the two buildings positioned on the site, and what would they look like from various points around the waterfront, Greenway and City? Where exactly would shadows be cast and for how long? What sections and portions of the proposed corridor of “open space” would be covered or closed in permanently or for extended periods?
Regardless of the answers to these questions, Harbor Towers believes the Chiofaro plan is vastly oversized for the site, and it should not be permitted.
Harbor Towers is a two-building community of more than 1,000 people at India Wharf, including individuals, couples, and families with children.